Effect of Concomitant Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors on Immunotherapy Clinical Response in Advanced Cancer Patients: Real-Life Setting.

The alteration of the gut microbiota mediated by proton pump inhibitor (PPI) drugs could be involved in the clinical response associated with immunotherapy [immunocheckpoint inhibitors (ICIs)] in cancer patients. Due to the current controversy in the scientific evidence, it has been proposed to evaluate the correlation between the concomitant use of PPIs and the effectiveness of immunotherapy in a real clinical practice setting. Single-center retrospective cohort study that included patients treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-CTLA4, including nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, or the combination ipilimumab-nivolumab in metastatic neoplastic disease. The clinical effectiveness of ICI, measured in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), was compared between the PPI-use versus PPI-no-use group. PPI-use group was associated with lower PFS [hazard ratio (HR):1.89 (1.38-2.59), P<0.001] and OS [HR: 2.02 (1.45-2.82), P<0.001] versus PPI-no-use group. However, this difference was not observed for pembrolizumab PFS [HR: 1.38 (0.93-2.39), P=0.160] and OS [HR: 1.41 (0.81-2.44), P=0.187]. The study showed significantly lower PFS and OS in the chronic PPI-use group (P<0.001), recent PPI-use group (P<0.001) and concomitant PPI-use group (P=0.001, 0.007) versus PPI-no-use group. However, late PPI use >30 days after the onset of ICI has no significant effect on the efficacy of treatment [HR: 0.92 (0.49-1.70), P=0.791; HR: 1.10 (0.59-2.05), P=0.756]. The concomitant use of PPIs in immunotherapy is associated with worse clinical outcomes compared with the group without PPI use. In addition, the study shows how the late use of PPIs does not have a significant effect on clinical benefit.

Vancomycin versus daptomycin for the treatment of confirmed gram-positive catheter-related bloodstream infections in oncology patients.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the effectiveness and safety of daptomycin versus vancomycin on the management catheter-related bloodstream  nfections in oncology patients. METHOD: A retrospective study was carried out including all patients admitted  at the Medical Oncology Unit between 2010 and 2018 with positive blood  cultures confirmed catheter-related bloodstream infections due to gram- positive microorganism, who were treated with either vancomycin or  daptomycin. The primary end point was all cause 30-days mortality, 30-days  hospital readmission and length of hospital stay (length of hospital stay). Results: A total of 70 patients with catheter-related bloodstream infections were included in the present study: vancomycin was administered to  61.4% (n = 43) and daptomycin to 38.6% (n = 27) of  patients. 78.5% (n = 55) of isolated bacteria showed a vancomycin minimum  inhibitory concentration ≤ 1 µg/ml. No differences were observed  between the two groups of patients regarding the 30-day mortality rate rate  (32.6% [n = 14] versus 29.6% [n = 8]; p = 0.797), the 30-day re-admission rate (30.2% [n = 13] versus 29.6% [n = 8]; p = 0.957) or the length of  hospital stay (18.9 versus 16.5 days; p = 0.562). Nephrotoxicity rate was  equivalent in both groups: a 7% (n = 3) of vancomycin goup versus a 7.4% (n  = 2) of daptomycin group (p = 0.946). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that both antibiotics are equivalent in their  safety and effectiveness. Therefore, vancomycin should continue being the  treatment of chose for gram-positive catheter-related bloodstream infections,  in particular at hospital centres with a low prevalence of strains that show  diminished susceptibility to vancomycin.

OBJETIVO: Analizar la eficacia y seguridad de la daptomicina frente a la  vancomicina en el tratamiento de las infecciones del torrente sanguíneo asociadas a catéter vascular en pacientes oncológicos.Método: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo que incluyó a los pacientes ingresados en la Unidad de Oncología-Médica entre 2010-2018 con infección del torrente sanguíneo asociada a catéter vascular causada por  grampositivos, y que fueron tratados con vancomicina o daptomicina. Como  objetivos principales se determinaron la tasa de mortalidad por todas las  causas a los 30 días, el reingreso hospitalario a los 30 días y la duración de la  estancia hospitalaria. RESULTADOS: El estudio incluyó 70 pacientes con infecciones del torrente sanguíneo asociadas a catéter vascular: el 61,4% (n = 43) recibió  vancomicina y el 38,6% (n = 27) daptomicina. El 78,5% (n = 55) de las  bacterias aisladas presentaron una concentración mínima inhibitoria de  vancomicina ≤ 1 µg/ml. No se observaron diferencias entre ambos grupos de  pacientes en cuanto a la tasa de mortalidad a 30 días (32,6% [n = 14]  frente al 29,6% [n = 8]; p = 0,797), la tasa de reingreso a 30 días (30,2% [n  = 13] frente al 29,6% [n = 8]; p = 0,957) o la duración de la hospitalización (18,9 frente a 16,5 días; p = 0,562). La tasa de nefrotoxicidad fue equivalente  en ambos grupos: 7% (n = 3) para vancomicina frente al 7,4% (n = 2) para  daptomicina (p = 0,946). CONCLUSIONES: Nuestros resultados muestran que ambos antibióticos son equivalentes en su seguridad y eficacia. Por ello, vancomicina debería seguir siendo el tratamiento de elección para la infección del torrente sanguíneo asociada a catéter vascular, especialmente en centros con  una baja prevalencia de cepas con una susceptibilidad disminuida a  ancomicina.

[Gastric metastases with a choriocarcinoma component from a postpuberal teratoma with mature histology]. / Metástasis gástricas con componente de coriocarcinoma de un teratoma testicular pospuberal con histología madura.

Germ cell tumors are the most frequent neoplasia in young males. The aims of this study is to describe a case in which a postpuberal teratoma suffers a transformation to choriocarcinoma and metastasize to stomach. We have made a systematic review in PubMed and consensus documents to study this mismatch between the tumour, metastasis and the exception of gastric metastatic affectation. We describe three options to explain this discordance: a mixed germ cells tumour, a burned out tumour or a germ cells tumour derived from a malignant germ cell tumour precursor or different clonal strains. After made a thorough investigation we conclude that the most truly option is the last one as we extensive explain below. Once the gastric metastatic lesions are extremely rare and reach to <5%, but there are not conclusive assessments.

Vancomicina frente a daptomicina como tratamiento de las bacteriemias asociadas a catéter y causadas por grampositivos en el paciente oncológico / Vancomycin versus daptomycin for the treatment of confirmed gram-positive catheter-related bloodstream infections in oncology patients

Objetivo: Analizar la eficacia y seguridad de la daptomicina frente ala vancomicina en el tratamiento de las infecciones del torrente sanguíneoasociadas a catéter vascular en pacientes oncológicos.Método: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo que incluyó a los pacientesingresados en la Unidad de Oncología-Médica entre 2010-2018 coninfección del torrente sanguíneo asociada a catéter vascular causadapor grampositivos, y que fueron tratados con vancomicina o daptomicina.Como objetivos principales se determinaron la tasa de mortalidad portodas las causas a los 30 días, el reingreso hospitalario a los 30 días yla duración de la estancia hospitalaria.Resultados: El estudio incluyó 70 pacientes con infecciones del torrentesanguíneo asociadas a catéter vascular: el 61,4% (n = 43) recibió vancomicinay el 38,6% (n = 27) daptomicina. El 78,5% (n = 55) de las bacteriasaisladas presentaron una concentración mínima inhibitoria de vancomicina≤ 1 μg/ml. No se observaron diferencias entre ambos grupos depacientes en cuanto a la tasa de mortalidad a 30 días (32,6% [n = 14] frente al 29,6% [n = 8]; p = 0,797), la tasa de reingreso a 30 días (30,2%[n = 13] frente al 29,6% [n = 8]; p = 0,957) o la duración de la hospitalización(18,9 frente a 16,5 días; p = 0,562). La tasa de nefrotoxicidadfue equivalente en ambos grupos: 7% (n = 3) para vancomicina frente al7,4% (n = 2) para daptomicina (p = 0,946).Conclusiones: Nuestros resultados muestran que ambos antibióticos sonequivalentes en su seguridad y eficacia. Por ello, vancomicina deberíaseguir siendo el tratamiento de elección para la infección del torrentesanguíneo asociada a catéter vascular, especialmente en centros con unabaja prevalencia de cepas con una susceptibilidad disminuida a vancomicina.

Objective: To analyse the effectiveness and safety of daptomycin versusvancomycin on the management catheter-related bloodstream infectionsin oncology patients.Method: A retrospective study was carried out including all patientsadmitted at the Medical Oncology Unit between 2010 and 2018 withpositive blood cultures confirmed catheter-related bloodstream infectionsdue to gram-positive microorganism, who were treated with either vancomycinor daptomycin. The primary end point was all cause 30-daysmortality, 30-days hospital readmission and length of hospital stay (lengthof hospital stay).Results: A total of 70 patients with catheter-related bloodstream infectionswere included in the present study: vancomycin was administeredto 61.4% (n = 43) and daptomycin to 38.6% (n = 27) of patients.78.5% (n = 55) of isolated bacteria showed a vancomycin minimuminhibitory concentration ≤ 1 μg/ml. No differences were observed betweenthe two groups of patients regarding the 30-day mortality rate rate (32.6% [n = 14] versus 29.6% [n = 8]; p = 0.797), the 30-day re-admissionrate (30.2% [n = 13] versus 29.6% [n = 8]; p = 0.957) or the lengthof hospital stay (18.9 versus 16.5 days; p = 0.562). Nephrotoxicity ratewas equivalent in both groups: a 7% (n = 3) of vancomycin goup versus a7.4% (n = 2) of daptomycin group (p = 0.946).Conclusions: Our results show that both antibiotics are equivalent intheir safety and effectiveness. Therefore, vancomycin should continuebeing the treatment of chose for gram-positive catheter-related bloodstreaminfections, in particular at hospital centres with a low prevalence ofstrains that show diminished susceptibility to vancomycin.

Patient-reported outcomes and digital literacy of patients treated in an oncology day hospital unit.

INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) use, via a computer registry, allows patients to report their symptoms enabling the detection of early signs of progression of the disease. For such a record, the patient needs to show certain skills in new technologies use. The present study aimed to analyse the perception and degree of digital literacy of patients undergoing oncological treatment in an Oncology Day Hospital (ODH). METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed, where the degree of literacy of patients attending antineoplastic treatment at the ODH was examined by means of an anonymous survey. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients have been included in the study. The proportion of subjects who use the electronic mail (TM) and the Internet on a daily basis was 45.1% and 70.5%, respectively, and up to 77.9% from the subjects considered that the use of digital 2.0 strategies could help improve communication between healthcare professional and patient.The TM was determined by the age, educational level and employment status of the individual. Furthermore, the age of the patients conditioned their perception of the usefulness of the web 2.0 tools (T2.0). CONCLUSION: This study allowed us to establish a target patient profile to conduct the efficient monitoring of cancer progression by PROs. The results have shown that approximately 60% of the patients in our population could be potential candidates to receive PROs-based health care. This approach enables earlier detection of symptoms and signs of progression and consequently, improves health outcomes for cancer patients.

Cost-effectiveness of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin as first line treatment for patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in Spain / Coste-eficacia del pemetrexed en combinación con cisplatino como tratamiento de primera línea en pacientes con cáncer de pulmón avanzado no microcítico ni escamoso en España

Introduction: Lung cancer is the third most frequent neoplastic tumour in Spain, with around 27000 new cases diagnosed per year; 80-95% of these are non-small-cell cancer (NSCLC), and the majority of cases are diagnosed in advanced stages of the disease, and for this reason it is one of the oncologic conditions with higher mortality rates (21.4% mean survival at 5 years). The main treatment regimens used for first-line treatment of NSCLC are: cisplatin/pemetrexed (cis/pem), cisplatin/gemcitabine/bevacizumab (cis/gem/bev), and carboplatin/paclitaxel/ bevacizumab (carb/pac/bev). The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness ratio of antineoplastic 1st line NSCLC treatment regimens, from the point of view of hospital management. Methodology: A cost-efficacy mathematical model was prepared, based on a decision tree. The efficacy variable was Progression Free Survival, obtained from the PARAMOUNT, AVAIL and SAIL Phase III clinical trials. The study was conducted from the perspective of the hospital management, considering only the direct costs of drug acquisition. A deterministic sensitivity analysis was conducted to confirm the robustness of outcomes. Results: The PFS obtained in clinical trials with cis/pem, cis/ gem/bev and carb/pac/bev was: 6.9, 6.7 and 6.2 months, respectively. Based on our model, the mean cost of treatment per patient for these regimens was: 19942 Euros, 15594 Euros and 36095 Euros, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per month of additional PFS between cis/pem and cis/gem/bev was 19303 Euros . Estimating a 30% reduction in acquisition costs for pemetrexed (Alimta®Eli Lilly Nederland B.V.), due to the forthcoming launch of generic medications, the cis/pem treatment would become the predominant alternative for 1st line treatment of NSCLC patients, by offering the best health results at a lower cost (AU)

Introducción: El cáncer de pulmón es la tercera neoplasia tumoral más frecuente en España, con unos 27.000 nuevos casos/ año, de los que el 80-85% son de etiología no microcítica (NSCLC) y en la mayoría de los casos diagnosticados en estadíos avanzados de la enfermedad, razón por la que es uno de los procesos oncológicos con mayores tasas de mortalidad (supervivencia media a los 5 años del 21,4%). Los principales esquemas de primera línea utilizados en el tratamiento del NSCLC son: cisplatino/pemetrexed (cis/pem), cisplatino/gemcitabina/ bevacizumab (cis/gem/bev), y carboplatino/paclitaxel/bevacizumab (carbo/pac/Bev). El objetivo del presente trabajo consistirá en realizar un análisis para estimar el ratio coste-eficacia de los esquemas antineoplásicos de primera línea en el tratamiento del NSCLC, desde la perspectiva de la gerencia hospitalaria. Métodos: Se elaboró un modelo matemático de coste-eficacia basado en un árbol de decisiones. Como variable de eficacia se utilizó la supervivencia libre de progresión, obtenida de los ensayos clínicos fase III PARAMOUNT, AVAIL y SAIL. El estudio se efectuó desde la perspectiva de la gerencia hospitalaria considerando únicamente los costes directos de adquisición de los fármacos. Se realizó un análisis de sensibilidad determinístico para comprobar la robustez de los resultados. Resultados: La SLP obtenida en los ensayos clínicos de los tratamientos cis/pem, cis/gem/bev y carb/pac/bev fue de: 6,9, 6,7 y 6,2 meses, respectivamente. En base a nuestro modelo, el coste medio del tratamiento por paciente para estos esquemas fue de 19.942 Euros, 15.594 Euros y 36.095 Euros, respectivamente. La razón coste-eficacia incremenal por mes de SLP adicional entre cis/pem y cis/gem/bev fue de 19.303 Euros. Estimando una reducción del 30% de los costes de adquisición de pemetrexed (Alimta®Eli Lilly Nederland B.V) ante su próxima incorporación al mercado de medicamentos genéricos, el tratamiento cis/pem se convertiría en la alternativa dominante en el tratamiento de primera línea de los pacientes con NSCLC, al ofrecer los mejores resultados en salud a un menor coste (AU)

Cost-effectiveness of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin as first line treatment for patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer is the third most frequent neoplastic tumour in Spain, with around 27 000 new cases diagnosed per year; 80-95% of these are non-small-cell cancer (NSCLC), and the majority of cases are diagnosed in advanced stages of the disease, and for this reason it is one of the oncologic conditions with higher mortality rates (21.4% mean survival at 5 years). The main treatment regimens used for first-line treatment of NSCLC are: cisplatin/pemetrexed (cis/pem), cisplatin/gemcitabine/ bevacizumab (cis/gem/bev), and carboplatin/paclitaxel/ bevacizumab (carb/pac/bev). The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness ratio of antineoplastic 1st line NSCLC treatment regimens, from the point of view of hospital management. METHODOLOGY: A cost-efficacy mathematical model was prepared, based on a decision tree. The efficacy variable was Progression Free Survival, obtained from the PARAMOUNT, AVAIL and SAIL Phase III clinical trials. The study was conducted from the perspective of the hospital management, considering only the direct costs of drug acquisition. A deterministic sensitivity analysis was conducted to confirm the robustness of outcomes. RESULTS: The PFS obtained in clinical trials with cis/pem, cis/ gem/bev and carb/pac/bev was: 6.9, 6.7 and 6.2 months, respectively. Based on our model, the mean cost of treatment per patient for these regimens was: 19 942 €, 15 594 € and 36 095 €, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per month of additional PFS between cis/pem and cis/gem/bev was 19 303 €. Estimating a 30% reduction in acquisition costs for pemetrexed (Alimta®Eli Lilly Nederland B.V.), due to the forthcoming launch of generic medications, the cis/pem treatment would become the predominant alternative for 1st line treatment of NSCLC patients, by offering the best health results at a lower cost.

Introducción: El cáncer de pulmón es la tercera neoplasia tumoral más frecuente en España, con unos 27.000 nuevos casos/ año, de los que el 80-85% son de etiología no microcítica (NSCLC) y en la mayoría de los casos diagnosticados en estadíos avanzados de la enfermedad, razón por la que es uno de los procesos oncológicos con mayores tasas de mortalidad (supervivencia media a los 5 años del 21,4%). Los principales esquemas de primera línea utilizados en el tratamiento del NSCLC son: cisplatino/pemetrexed (cis/pem), cisplatino/gemcitabina/ bevacizumab (cis/gem/bev), y carboplatino/paclitaxel/bevacizumab (carbo/pac/Bev). El objetivo del presente trabajo consistirá en realizar un análisis para estimar el ratio coste-eficacia de los esquemas antineoplásicos de primera línea en el tratamiento del NSCLC, desde la perspectiva de la gerencia hospitalaria. Metodos: Se elaboró un modelo matemático de coste-eficacia basado en un árbol de decisiones. Como variable de eficacia se utilizó la supervivencia libre de progresión, obtenida de los ensayos clínicos fase III PARAMOUNT, AVAIL y SAIL. El estudio se efectuó desde la perspectiva de la gerencia hospitalaria considerando únicamente los costes directos de adquisición de los fármacos. Se realizó un análisis de sensibilidad determinístico para comprobar la robustez de los resultados. Resultados: La SLP obtenida en los ensayos clínicos de los tratamientos cis/pem, cis/gem/bev y carb/pac/bev fue de: 6,9, 6,7 y 6,2 meses, respectivamente. En base a nuestro modelo, el coste medio del tratamiento por paciente para estos esquemas fue de 19.942 €, 15.594 € y 36.095 €, respectivamente. La razón coste-eficacia incremenal por mes de SLP adicional entre cis/pem y cis/gem/bev fue de 19.303 €. Estimando una reducción del 30% de los costes de adquisición de pemetrexed (Alimta®Eli Lilly Nederland B.V) ante su próxima incorporación al mercado de medicamentos genéricos, el tratamiento cis/pem se convertiría en la alternativa dominante en el tratamiento de primera línea de los pacientes con NSCLC, al ofrecer los mejores resultados en salud a un menor coste.

Changes on bone mineral density after adjuvant treatment in women with non-metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: . Adjuvant therapies have prolonged survival of non-metastatic breast cancer (NMBC) patients, but they also decrease bone mineral density (BMD). We have analyzed the effects of chemotherapy, hormone therapy with tamoxifen or both, on BMD of women with NMBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively included 168 women with NMBC (stage I-III) referred to the Medical Oncology Service of University Hospital of Canary Islands between 1997 and 2001 (55 +/- 12 years; 37% premenopausal; 43 +/- 13 months of follow-up). We measured lumbar and hip BMD (g/cm2) at diagnosis, after chemotherapy and after 12 months of tamoxifen. If a low BMD was detected, women were treated with bisphosphonates. RESULTS: BMD after chemotherapy (n = 83) significantly decreased at lumbar (1.014 +/- 0; 0.995 +/- 0, p = 0.0001), trochanter (0.701 +/- 0; 0.690 +/- 0, p = 0.001), intertrochanter (1.095 +/- 0; 1.078 +/- 0, p = 0.0001) and total hip (0.924 +/- 0; 0.915 +/- 0, p = 0.046) areas. Although 60% of the premenopausal women suffered amenorrhea after chemotherapy, there were not significant differences in BMD between them and women who retained menses. BMD of women who received 12 months of tamoxifen after chemotherapy increased--total hip (0.907 +/- 0; 0.922 +/- 0, p = 0.005) and intertrochanter (1.071 +/- 0; 1.091 +/- 0, p = 0.003)--or remained stable--lumbar, femoral neck, trochanter, and Ward's triangle (n = 39). When tamoxifen was the only adjuvant treatment, BMD after 12 months (n = 22) increased in trochanter area (0.644 +/- 0; 0.663 +/- 0, p = 0.011), and remained stable in all other sites. 50 (30%) patients were treated with bisphosphonates because of osteopenia. CONCLUSION: Women with NMBC are affected by early bone loss after adjuvant chemotherapy. This bone loss is attenuated by one year of tamoxifen treatment.